WEKO3
アイテム
保健体育科の教育実習生に対する実習校の評価に関する研究 : 愛知県と他府県の比較を中心として
https://chukyo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/9517
https://chukyo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/95174d7ced61-ea98-49a1-ae4d-d00fd11cd6ce
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00004196728.pdf (1.0 MB)
|
|
| Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper_02(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2016-11-14 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 保健体育科の教育実習生に対する実習校の評価に関する研究 : 愛知県と他府県の比較を中心として | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Evaluation of Student Apprentices in Teaching Practicum of Health and Physical Education : A Comparsion Between Evaluations in Aichi and Other Prefectures | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00081735 | |||||
| 著者 |
新井, 猛浩
× 新井, 猛浩× 平井, 佐紀子× 家田, 重晴× 勝亦, 紘一× ARAI, Takehiro× HIRAI, Sakiko× IEDA, Shigeharu× KATSUMATA, Koichi |
|||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||
| 山形大学教育学部 | ||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||
| 中京大学大学院 | ||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||
| 中京大学 | ||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||
| 中京大学 | ||||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 原著論文 | |||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | Original Article | |||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | In this study a survey was made of the actual conditions in evaluating student apprentices in a teaching practicum of health and physical education as well as some factors affecting their evaluations. This research was carried out to evaluate 701 student apprentices in the teaching practicum of health and physical education in 1994 and 1995. A total of 588 students responded to the questionnaire (response rate of 90.6%) administered annually following the completion of their teaching practicum. The main results are as follows : The obvious difference between the evaluations in Aichi and in other prefectures is that the evaluations in Aichi are relatively stricter. One of the reasons for this regional difference may be attributed to a preferential treatment shown by apprentices' former teachers to their students in their alma mater. For a fair and objective evaluation of student apprentices, the schools to which the students are sent should be allocated by the Board of Education. It is equally advisable that students' leadership qualities be evaluated not by a single teacher but by a number of teachers. Using the evaluations by schools as a resource for judgment, the proper term of effective apprentice practice may be three weeks, instead of two, during which the students are to be in charge of at least 10 and hopefully about 20 class practice sessions. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
中京大学体育学論叢 en : Research journal of physical education Chukyo University 巻 39, 号 2, p. 89-101, 発行日 1998-03-17 |
|||||
| 表示順 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 8 | |||||
| アクセション番号 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | KJ00004196728 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02887339 | |||||
